Charter: Canterbury Chart. Ant. C.69, Red Book, no. 3
Description (from Electronic Saywer)
HS, pp. 485-6, spurious; Stenton 1918, p. 449, MS 1 contemporary, but abnormal in structure and phraseology, correct date may be 795 (= Stenton 1970), p. 63); PN Middx, pp. 2, 29, 39, 40; Ekwall 1962, p. 27, on place-name; Bruckner 1965, p. 12 n. 10, MS 1 not contemporary; Stenton 1971, p. 225, treats as authentic; Gelling, ECTV, no. 205, spurious; Scharer 1982, p. 267, spurious; Wormald 1983, p. 110, forgery; Brooks 1984, pp. 120-1, 320-1, spurious, forger perhaps used the record of a 795 synod, MS 1 written in imitative script; Cubitt 1995, p. 81, on formulation, p. 275, cannot be authentic but may be based on a genuine synodal record; Bailey 1996, p. 69, on Hayes
Current location
- Repository
- Cathedral Library and Archives
- Town or City
- Canterbury
- Shelfmark
- Chart. Ant. C.69
Other information
- Catalogue Numbers
- S. 132
- Format
- Single-sheet
- Date
- 790 for ? 795
Electronic Saywer (S. 132)
HS, pp. 485-6, spurious; Stenton 1918, p. 449, MS 1 contemporary, but abnormal in structure and phraseology, correct date may be 795 (= Stenton 1970), p. 63); PN Middx, pp. 2, 29, 39, 40; Ekwall 1962, p. 27, on place-name; Bruckner 1965, p. 12 n. 10, MS 1 not contemporary; Stenton 1971, p. 225, treats as authentic; Gelling, ECTV, no. 205, spurious; Scharer 1982, p. 267, spurious; Wormald 1983, p. 110, forgery; Brooks 1984, pp. 120-1, 320-1, spurious, forger perhaps used the record of a 795 synod, MS 1 written in imitative script; Cubitt 1995, p. 81, on formulation, p. 275, cannot be authentic but may be based on a genuine synodal record; Bailey 1996, p. 69, on Hayes